DeFi · News

Dune Study Finds 85% of Concentrated DEX Liquidity Idle in H1 2026, With Retail LPs Sitting on $1.6B in Dead Capital

A Dune study for 1inch finds 85% of concentrated liquidity sat idle in H1 2026, with $542M out of range weekly and retail LPs missing $150M in annual fees.

Dune Study Finds 85% of Concentrated DEX Liquidity Idle in H1 2026, With Retail LPs Sitting on $1.6B in Dead Capital

Concentrated liquidity was supposed to fix decentralized exchanges’ capital efficiency problem. It didn’t. A Dune study commissioned by 1inch found that 85% of capital across the top ~200 concentrated-liquidity pools sat underutilized during the first half of 2026 — only 14% actively touched by trades at any given moment — meaning the vast majority of liquidity provider deposits earned nothing while occupying on-chain real estate.

E
Ethereum
ETH
View coin →
$1,845.45 1.59%
Market cap · $222.75B

The numbers are brutal. An average of 29.5% of capital sat completely outside the active price range, earning zero fees; that works out to roughly $542 million dead in the water in any given week. Across Uniswap v3/v4, PancakeSwap, and Aerodrome, total underutilized liquidity comes to approximately $1.6 billion. A significant chunk hadn’t been touched in over 90 days — suggesting LPs either abandoned positions outright or never grasped that concentrated liquidity requires active management to function.

Here’s the part that cuts hardest against the usual DeFi narrative. The dead capital is held predominantly by retail wallets, not automated bots or managed vaults. Concentrated liquidity market maker design — pioneered by Uniswap v3 in 2021 — requires LPs to pick narrow price ranges for their deposits, and when price moves outside that range, the position stops earning fees and becomes inert capital; active management, or delegation to vaults and automated strategies, is the assumed fix. The data shows most users aren’t doing either.

The fee gap

Idle LPs are missing out on approximately $150 million per year in foregone fees, per the study. That figure captures the gap between what capital deployed in optimal ranges would earn versus what these out-of-range and underutilized positions actually generate. Stings, for a sector that sells itself on yield. The average retail LP in concentrated pools is handing traders free optionality while collecting little in return.

The Defiant’s coverage noted the study’s scope covered H1 2026, making it a real-time snapshot rather than a historical autopsy — and the timing matters. Uniswap v4, launched with hooks and custom pool logic designed in part to improve LP outcomes, shows the same 85% idle rate as v3. The upgrade has not moved the needle on capital utilization. Whatever architectural improvements v4 introduced, they have not translated into better LP behavior at the pool level.

Who benefits from this story

1inch commissioned the report. That detail carries weight and shouldn’t be buried. 1inch is a DeFi aggregator whose core value proposition is routing trades across fragmented liquidity to find the best price, and highlighting inefficiency in concentrated-liquidity pools — where capital sits unused and spreads may be thinner than headline TVL suggests — directly supports 1inch’s commercial case that aggregation matters more than ever when liquidity is scattered and underperforming. The underlying on-chain analysis from Dune may be methodologically sound. But the messenger has skin in the game. Read accordingly.

The broader market backdrop adds another layer. Total crypto market cap sits at $2.27 trillion, down 1.51% over 24 hours, with the Fear & Greed Index at 27 — firmly in fear territory — and EETH$1,845.451.59%, the chain where most of this concentrated liquidity lives, trades at $1,855, down 3.54% on the day. Thin sentiment and falling prices push retail LPs further out of range as volatility whipsaws through pools set up in calmer conditions. A position placed when ETH was trading near $2,400 can sit uselessly below the current band for months if the holder never rebalances.

The Street reported the $1.6 billion figure as a measure of structural inefficiency rather than a transient one. The 90-day inactivity threshold is the telling detail. These aren’t positions caught in a temporary drawdown, waiting to recover — they’re deposits their owners have effectively forgotten about, or chosen not to manage.

What it means for the next cycle

If 85% of concentrated liquidity is structurally underutilized even after Uniswap’s v4 upgrade, the burden of solving the problem shifts up the stack — away from protocol design and toward automated vaults, LP-as-a-service platforms, and aggregators that can route around dead capital. Protocols building active management tools, and aggregators like 1inch that can identify where liquidity actually functions, stand to benefit if the findings push more users toward delegation. The open question heading into H2 2026 is whether retail LPs will migrate to managed strategies, or keep parking capital in ranges that never trade.

Marcus Feld

Marcus Feld

DeFi & On-chain Analyst · 6 years covering crypto · Author page

Marcus Feld is CoinScoop's DeFi and on-chain analyst. He digs into L2 activity, stablecoin flows and protocol revenue, translating raw chain data into plain-English calls.

Disclosure: This article is independent journalism and is for information only — it is not financial advice. CoinScoop is reader-supported and may earn a commission from some links. Read our disclosure policy →